Thursday, March 6, 2008

Continuing the Sidewalk Abortion Argument

Waiting after school I found blue pamphlets littered over the grass. On the covers was a picture of a frightened woman desperately trying to escape from the inside of an hourglass; big letters spelled out “trapped…” It was anti-abortion propaganda. I was curious – where was this from? I turned to my left and a massive poster of an aborted fetus caught my eyes; it was part of a display that featured statistics, diagrams, and two brave and indignant youths willing to verbally clarify the horrors of the image and the “murdering of children.”

And so I approached them to see if they had anything logical to say about their argument. They didn’t. It was all the same emotionally driven rhetoric you hear all the time. Their organization, the “Human Life Alliance,” is also big fans of abstinence and vegetative existence.

If it weren’t for time, our argument could have gone on for hours. What kept us from finalizing results was due to the fact that they, like all abortion protesters, were driven by sentiment. The problem with the valiantly dubbed pro-life campaign is that its followers saw images of aborted fetuses, heard the words “murder” and “babies,” and decided to act upon their initial response: terror. They stopped right before the part where you think about the situation logically.

It is an evolutionary adaptation that a human being be sympathetic toward its young. If it weren’t for our emotional attachment to babies, then they’d never be cared for, and they’d never survive to grow old. In fact, psychological studies have proven that we usually consider anything with big eyes and a big head to be “cute.” This quirk about humans, derived from the evolutionary adaptation of mammals and long-term childcare, is evident as it applies even to other baby animals and caricatures. Why else are cartoons drawn the way they are, and why else are there so many baby animal documentaries? Have you ever had a sympathetic connection with a grotesque insect, a faceless jellyfish, or a head of lettuce that was mutilated to make your salad? These are all organic, living organisms.

This fact is the whole reason people are so unbelievably appalled by these grotesque and graphic images. I am too. But I don’t get carried away in my emotion; I think about it twice, rationally, reasonably.

Most of the debate on abortion revolves around the definition of a human being. At what point after sex does tissue become considered alive and a person? One of the youths I argued with repeatedly tried to make the point that after the sperm reaches the egg, the resulting formation has 46 human chromosomes, and thus constitutes a human being; his argument was: after that point on, killing this tissue would be the same awful crime as murdering a baby.

There is a difference between new fetal tissue and a breathing baby. The former has no nervous system, no brain, and no conscience. It takes months for these to develop, and considering that most people can barely even remember anything before they were toddlers, then it would be safe to assume that this nervous system, this brain, and this conscience are not very strong. If it dies, it will never know it ever existed. This is the cruel and logical truth. No matter how ugly or bloody. In fact, it is highly unlikely that fetuses can even sense pain before the third trimester*.

The justification for the cruelty of an abortion is the claim that when you abort a fetus, you’ve taken away someone’s chance to be born and to live fully. (Who knows, this aborted fetus could have grown up to cure cancer!) I then wonder: in this context, what is the difference between abortion and choosing to not have kids? Aren’t you taking away someone’s chance to live every second you’re not pregnant or getting someone pregnant?

And in a world ridden with an exponentially growing 6.5-billion human population, is it really wise to allow millions more to crowd and poison this Earth? We’d be setting ourselves up with the disaster of overpopulation. We must level out our birth and death rates. And if you want to consider the fact that some developed states are offering government incentives to promote childbearing, first consider the millions of children born into undeveloped states, with no parents, and that definitely haven’t been adopted yet. (The aforementioned blue pamphlet makes the ridiculous claim that overpopulation is a myth).

You wouldn’t believe the absurd statements these youths and their leaflets make. When I told that kid that newly developed fetuses have undeveloped consciences, he somehow related that remark to me “judging” people based on their size! He then went on relating the attitude of my remark to being the cause of racism! In fact, their pamphlet calls abortion “a form of discrimination against disabled people.” Their use of words is so creative and twisted that it’s appalling! You cannot listen to these people when they refer to unconscious and undeveloped fetuses as “babies” and “children”! They are human. Yes. But they wouldn’t be any more alive and human than a severed human finger!

The pro-life campaign is purely emotionally driven. It has no logical basis. It is why those youths’ display features a five-foot tall image of an aborted fetus – to attract more emotion, to collect more sympathy! There was a man standing next to me eating it all up, shocked and terrified. Do not allow yourself to be overcome with irrational terror. Do not listen to them when they relate abortion with “genocide” and “racism.”

The pro-life campaign is the reason that clinics are being firebombed, and doctors willing to perform abortions are having their lives threatened by angry mobs. The pro-life campaign is the reason that these doctors must resort to so-called “Back-Alley” abortions, so they can perform their duty as servants of their patents, without risking their lives and careers by infuriated pro-life proponents. Women who have gone through this process must live with a guilt they don't deserve when this campaign screams "Murder!" in their faces.

Rethink your stance on abortion, right now.


p.s. Please, if you’ve read this, write a comment. If you are “pro-life” and have read this entry and are still “pro-life,” tell me why. Whatever your stance is, let me know and let me know why. If you are part of the Human Life Alliance, or one of the sidewalk leaflet vendors that visited James Monroe High School around 3pm on Thursday, March 06, 2008, please respond so we can finish that interrupted discussion of ours. “No hard feelings.”

Links, sources, notes:
The Human Life Alliance - http://www.humanlife.org/index.php
A PDF version of the pamphlet mentioned in the entry - http://www.humanlife.org/trapped.php
*“…fetal perception of pain is unlikely before the third trimester” Source: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/294/8/947

If you’d like to see some of the graphic images of aborted fetuses, just turn off your safe filter and google (image) “abortion.” Remember to think twice. http://images.google.com/

3 comments:

missxalaska said...

Your argument makes sense. My argument on pro-life is an entirely emotional connection to a life that doesn't really exist. But the truth is, we are human.
I am not going to lecture you about abortion. You have heard my views specifically. But I would rather discuss the fact that a human being with no emotional reasoning would not be human.

Human beings have spent their evolution controlled by instinct, by emotions, and by feeling. To tell some people to disconnect themselves to an unborn being would be entirely impossible. We aren't controlled by robots but are controlled by our own emotionally connected choices.


I don't approve of this Human Life Alliance. I don't think it's my place to tell people what to think. But, I don't agree it is okay for you to bash on a group of people for making decisions based on emotions when it is the human condition. To live rationally would lead to the death of most of human kind. Hitler thought he was rational, and his people agreed that he made sense. They believed they had it logically figured out.

You could say he was wrong of course. But thats not the point. Even rationality is subjective. What our country/society thinks is rational is completely different from another group of people. What you think is rational to you, doesn't work for everyone. Your information, your studies, and your facts is another form of propaganda fed to you by our society. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I want you to understand that even human beings are too emotionally connected to concepts such as rationality. Rationality really doesnt exist. Its human kind's need for things to make sense.

I hope you don't think me foolish. I am pro-life and I am sure that won't change anytime soon. But I do believe, if we want to be rational, to not have sex in the first place. The only thing that angered me about your blog is that you act as if the action of sex is entirely rational. I think it would make more sense to give up an ENTIRELY emotional action. Wouldn't that be the rational thing to do?

And, lastly, I have to say: Rational women who have known the process of abortion tend to go out there and have sex again. Being female, I have met a wide variety of women. It is rare to find a woman who's had an abortion and hasn't began having sex again quickly after the procedure. The vast majority of women who have had abortions, have had more then one. Oh, so rational.

Jeffrey Antonio Gomez said...

You're right when you say "a human being with no emotional reasoning would not be human." Completely correct. Still: if we chose to live by our emotions alone, we'd still think the Earth is flat, that tomatoes are poisonous, and that the eccentric woman next door is a witch. (Then we'd set her on fire.)

There are times when we can embrace emotions because they bring us joy, or motivate us to do good deeds (raise our children, volunteer, stay faithful, etc.). But there are other times when we must overcome them, because they distract us from allowing us to "think straight."

Hitler? I don't even know why you brought that up. Just because you think you're right doesn't mean you're right - you and I both know that. But if you can PROVE what you believe, and not ever be proven to be incorrect, then most likely, you are right. Think about how in the international scientific community, every claim MUST be logically validated by scientists all over the world before it is accepted. If any objection is made that cannot be defeated, the claim simply fails. (Eek, imagine a scientific community based on emotion!)

You say rationalism is subjective. I disagree. CULTURAL "rationalism" is subjective, but there is an ultimate logic that cannot be questioned; because simply put, if it CAN be questioned and defeated, it is not logical! In what culture can 1 plus 1 not equal 2? Math is formal logic in its most basic form, but the point is, everything can follow a logical basis. The universe IS math, with a shitload of variables.

Let's not get carried away.

Like I said earlier, there are times to embrace emotions. Sex, rationally and emotionally, can be one of them (let's say, if you're not wrecking a home).

In the style of formal logic, allow me to explain.

Sex feels good to many people.
People enjoy what feels good.
Thus, many people enjoy having sex; it makes them feel good.

(Even dolphins have sex, just for pleasure.)

So who loses? Your neck might be a bit sore, but it was worth it wasn't it?


p.s. What is your point about women still having sex even after getting an abortion? Did I ever say getting an abortion would make you stop having sex? And why does it matter?

Oh, and, I'm not saying you're wrong or anything, it's just kind of hard to believe - although I'd believe it if it were true. Can you show me the statistic that supports your claim: "The vast majority of women who have had abortions, have had more then one"? I hope you weren't going by emotion when you said that.

免費日本成人色情卡通漫畫圖片 said...

激情辣妹脫衣秀 -
707網愛聊天室 -
a383成人影音城 -
0509視訊聊天 -
ok成人影音 -
xyz辣妹影音聊天網 -
影音無限 -
love104影音 -
101美女三點全露自拍 -
無名小站網路相簿 -
脫衣主播美女 -
熊貓貼圖區 -
言情小說免費線上 -
全裸自拍寫真 -
免費情色短片 -
人妻熟女寫真館 -
美美情色網 -
情色影音下載 -
台灣本土女優 -
學生妹自拍貼圖 -
情人視訊影音聊天網 -
台灣kiss -
波波情色貼圖站 -
後宮電影網址 -
水電工阿廷免費影片 -
免費情色圖片欣賞 -
成人卡通色情 -
洪爺色站 -
金瓶梅情色成人網 -
情色dvd光碟 -
台灣美女寫真光碟 -
午夜情挑視訊聊天室 -
0401視訊美女 -
性感寶貝粉妹視訊聊天室 -
八國辣妹視訊聊天 -
制服美女網路相簿 -
辣妹脫衣區 -
自拍寫真小弟弟圖貼 -
173影音LiVE秀 -
美女情人視訊網 -